For Pete’s Sake… Just Do It!

Almost two years ago — June 30, 2020, to be exact — I wrote and published a post with the title “Just Do It”.  Now, I’m not expecting anyone here to remember that specific post, but if you’re curious you can go back and read it here: Just Do It     

I wasn’t thinking about that post either this morning as I sat down to finish up the final day of my 15-day “Floral Challenge”. For the record, it took me 24 days to do a 15-day challenge, but… who’s counting? I’m pleased that I completed all fifteen floral drawings. You’ve seen the first nine, and here are five of the final six:

Today’s prompt — the final one in the challenge — was “rose”. Yes, of course it was. Roses are challenging to draw, at least with any sort of realism. The challenge saved the best for last.

Even though realistic roses are difficult to draw, we can, however, easily draw very simple roses. Art Hub for Kids has a great little video demonstration.

This looks so simple, I’m sure even I could do this! But I didn’t want to. The point of this challenge was to push myself a bit, and I wasn’t going to take the easy way out as I’ve so often done in the past. Nope. Not this time. I was going to draw a rose — not a long-stemmed bud, but a real rose in bloom.

Over the years, I’ve drawn quite a few roses, and I can’t say that any of them have ever been very good, although I will say that some have been better than others.  You can see a few of my earliest roses — all from 2016 — here: A Rose Is a Rose Is a Rose

What I’m getting at, you see, is that I wasn’t especially thrilled at the idea of drawing or painting a rose. I was determined to do it just so I could officially finish the challenge, but I certainly wasn’t excited about it. I dreaded it, to tell the truth. I hem-hawed around. I kept busy with other things. I did my best to put it off as long as I could. Finally, I sucked in a deep breath. “Oh, for Pete’s sake! Just do it!” I muttered.

NOTE: In case you’re not familiar with the expression, “For Pete’s sake…” is a midwestern US colloquialism. Nobody know who Pete is.

I set the mood by lighting a stick of rose-fragranced incense. Not that it really helped; again, I was stalling. But the sooner I got started, the sooner I could finish, and even though I knew the results would not be pretty, I was ready at last to get it over and done with.

I’ve been doing these floral studies in oil pastels. It’s been a good experience, really. I’ve learned a few different techniques for using them, and another thing I’ve learned is how much I love adding watercolor backgrounds. The oil pastel resists the water, naturally, and I like the effect the watercolor adds.

But anyway… I grabbed my handy jar of Cray-Pas Expressionist oil pastels. Certainly not the most expensive oil pastels I own, definitely not my favorite oil pastels, but they had one advantage. They were sitting out in a jar on my desk. I grabbed the jar, took out an orange, a red, and a yellow, and I shrugged.

Just do it.

So, I did. I found a reference photo and tried to create a sense of the intricate folds of the petals. I knew I wasn’t doing very good, but … I just did it. I drew most of the basic shape with orange, used my darker red pastel for shadowed areas, then worked with my very light yellow to blend and shape the blooms. I later added a bit of Paul Rubens white to make the blending process smoother and easier.

I thought it was awful, and maybe it is. But as I sit here looking at it now, I actually do see a rose. It’s not the greatest rose, but it is a rose.

That was when I thought back to those words. Just do it. Had I written a post about those words before? Yes, I had, and what I’d written about was very much the same thing as what I’d just experienced.

It’s funny, really. Every time I tell myself I really can’t paint something, I find that if I sit down and just do it, I come up with something better than I’d expected. – From Just Do It

Today, two years later, I’m re-discovering this simple truth. I didn’t think I could draw or paint a rose at all, especially not using oil pastels. But I did it. And best of all, I had fun doing it. I really enjoyed using a “fan” brush and my little Cotman watercolors to add a background. Maybe that, too, could have been better, but hush! I’m tired of thinking in terms of good, better, and best.

I’m at a point now where art is becoming interesting. Let me rephrase that just a bit. I’m at a point now where MY ART is becoming interesting — to me, at least. I’m recognizing my own individual expression, and I’m allowing my art to be what it is. And time after time, I’m surprising myself.

It’s fun to step up, make my own choices, and figure out my own way of doing things. It’s fun to just do it. 

Advertisement

13 Comments

  1. Such a relatable post. “I’m tired of thinking in terms of good, better, and best.” -same! For me, it’s writing. I’m never fully satisfied with my stories, but once I decide to just do it anyway…I do create stories that surprise me, even if it’s not what I expected.

    I love all your artwork and that rose is so delicate and peaceful. I really love your color choices.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Oh, thank you so much for the kind words. 🙂 Yes, once we get started on a creative project, whether it’s art, writing, music, or anything else, we can often surprise ourselves. I know so many people who sit around waiting for “inspiration” — and the best way to find it is to “just do it.”

      Liked by 1 person

  2. “I’m recognizing my own individual expression, and I’m allowing my art to be what it is.”
    Judith, such a beautiful and beauty-filled post for this early morning start to my day. You refreshed me. Thank you! And I loved drawing the rose, 🌹 thanks for that too! It woke up the sleeping child!😄❤️
    Deb

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I think I’m repeating someone else’s advice: use 100% cotton 140 lb watercolor paper. I like the sizing on Arches, but Fabriano is also good. I have sold many of my watercolor paintings, and I never soak and stretch my paper. You don’t even need to use a watercolor block unless you are working wet in wet on the whole page. Instead of constantly buying new, “bargain” or student grade paints and dry media, use professional grade paper, paint, and brushes. If you are willing to learn about color, you can paint for years using only six to ten tubes of paint. The Winsor and Newton website suggested three “warm” and three “cool” transparent colors: 2 yellows, two reds, two blues, and I learned to mix just about any color I needed, including black, from playing with those. But the real secret is using professional quality watercolor paper for watercolor paintings! And, yes, you can paint on the back of your rejects! Congratulations on your progress!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Good advice. I like Arches when I do watercolor painting. I keep a lot of inexpensive paper in the studio for the grandkids. I use it too when I am playing around.

      Like

  4. Hi Judith. I’m not sure why whole posts of yours are turning up here in comments. Were they supposed to go to emails or something? I’ve never had this happen before, but have had two in as comments. Thought you might need to know, if you are pressing the wrong button?

    Like

  5. Hey there! I actually like your rose! It’s soft and creamy and full of color. I might not have put the blue and yellow stuff around the edges but the actual rose itself is Jim Dandy 100% great job!

    Liked by 1 person

I'd Love to Hear Your Thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s